How much parents could save from September's new school uniform rules

Sincity Press Staff 2 hours ago 2 min read 1
Sincity Press Brief

Parents should not have to buy more than three branded items, plus a tie for secondary schools.

Parents are experiencing a wide range of expenses under September’s new school uniform rules, as each institution sets its own policy and families encounter different expectations and costs. Lorraine, who lives in London and has two children in secondary schools, said she is frustrated that her school has not altered any part of its uniform policy this year. She explained that several items remain compulsory, including the branded blazer, tie, branded polo shirt, branded shorts and two‑toned PE socks. She added that even plain grey trousers or skirts must be bought from one of the school’s suppliers. Because both sons have undergone a growth spurt over the summer, Lorraine anticipates spending more than £200 on the branded items alone. “I'm conscionable frustrated, for maine it's not adjacent astur the money,” she said. “I consciousness these inconsistencies bash not marque a quality to acquisition and are truly blinkered,” she added. In contrast, Carol, a mother of five from Stockport, welcomed the changes at her children’s school. She noted that her son’s secondary school now requires only a branded blazer, a branded jumper and a tie, with all other items available from a variety of shops. Carol said she usually sources most of the uniform second‑hand but always purchases the blazer, which costs about £30, because she prefers her children to have a new one. She remarked that anything that makes uniforms more affordable for parents is simply a good thing. However, not all families are seeing the adjustments they hoped for. An unnamed parent from Oxfordshire, who did not wish to be identified, said his daughter still must have seven branded items — three for the uniform, three for PE and a summer polo garment — because no alternatives are permitted. “It's ridiculous and unfair. We are paying £200 which we can't afford,” he said.