2 hours ago The radical of top-20 players collectively deciding to bounds their media commitments is the latest measurement successful a long-running dispute.
The players held an archetypal gathering with the Grand Slams past twelvemonth and further talks person taken spot since,but determination has not been arsenic overmuch advancement arsenic the players would person liked.
The cardinal issues the players privation to alteration are:
Prize wealth - a higher ratio of prize money-to-revenue successful acknowledgement of what players lend to the fiscal occurrence of the tournaments, with much wealth trickling down to lower-ranked players
Player payment - however overmuch the Grand Slams are consenting to lend to pension, healthcare and maternity pots
More consultation - the players privation a accidental successful large decisions made by the Slams to alleviate gruelling schedules, precocious nighttime finishes and elongated tournaments
The radical has asked the Slams to wage 22% of their gross successful prize wealth by 2030, arguing the 15% the French Open is offering is inadequate.
This year's Roland Garros prize wealth has accrued by 9.5%, but the yearly summation was 20% astatine past year's US Open and astir 16% astatine January's Australian Open.
French Open tourney manager Amelie Mauresmo said she was "very sad" astir the enactment taken by the players but remained "deeply confident" the contented volition beryllium resolved.
Mauresmo and French Tennis Federation (FFT) president Gilles Moretton are owed to conscionable with erstwhile WTA president Larry Scott - who represents the players successful the quality - connected Friday.
The participating players would not beryllium drawn connected whether a boycott of the majors could beryllium their adjacent people of action.
"I don't cognize if I privation to commencement throwing astir the 'b-word'," American satellite fig 8 Taylor Fritz said.
"I don't deliberation we should truly marque large threats similar that unless we're afloat acceptable to bash it.
"But if it gets to a constituent wherever thing does person to alteration if we are ignored, that's a speech to have."
English (US)·